Normally I don't forecast rapid and blitz tournaments. My database has far fewer games at these time controls, so there is much uncertainty about the draw rate. Also, the rapid and blitz ratings are based on a far smaller number of games; this also leads to doubts about their reliability.
That being said, since GARRY is coming out of retirement, the event is too exciting to not make a forecast. In addition to the caveats above, remember that Kasparov's rating is more than 10 years out of date. Here is the forecast for the rapid section. I assumed a 40% draw rate, since that was the result in earlier blitz and rapid events in the 2016 Grand Chess Tour.
And the blitz:
The rapid portion is a round robin; the blitz is a double round robin.
There is a lot of uncertainty and speculation about how Kasparov will perform. Using the rating he had a decade ago is definitely questionable, so I thought of a more reliable way. Last year, Kasparov played in a blitz tournament with Caruana, So, and Nakamura after the US Chess Championship. He definitely did not embarrass himself: he scored 9.5/18 and briefly lead the tournament. And back in 2015, he demolished Nigel Short by 8.5-1.5. Though Short was well past his prime, he is still in the world's top 100.
A better estimate of Kasparov's blitz rating would be to take his performance rating from the 2016 tournament, which was 2778. The new forecast for the blitz portion is below.
There is hardly any data that I could use to update Kasparov's rapid rating. He beat Short by 1.5-0.5 in the rapid part of their 2015 match. But that's just 2 games. I would want a larger sample before making any new predictions. And if you think his 2812 rating is an overestimate in the rapids, remember that he actually did even better in the rapid match with Short, performing around 2900.
In any case, Garry definitely has a chance of winning the tournament.
Sunday, August 13, 2017
Saturday, August 12, 2017
E4stat visits Round 7 of the Sinquefield Cup
I arrived early, so the visit began with a trip to the Kingside Diner and the World Chess Hall of Fame gift shop. Those of you who have little pawns can buy this shirt for them. I wonder if Sergey Karjakin got this shirt for his newborn son?
MVL won the tournament. In this round, he played the white side of the Berlin endgame. But don't accuse him of being boring - it was a tense game. He rattled off about 30 moves of preparation while Karjakin was taking long thinks. But the "Minister of Defense" was up to the task and held a draw. Karjakin later tweeted, "I have checked my notes. I knew everything till 38...Ne4. But had to spend about 2 hours to remember :D!"

Ian Nepomniachtchi played Black against Vishy. The game was heading toward a draw, but then Nepo tried an unwise simplifying trick.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
After lingering in the gift shop, I went to the playing hall. None of the players had arrived yet, so I had time to take pictures of the banners. GARRY is coming to the Rapid & Blitz. Yes, that Garry.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
They had a display for the US Chess Championship
********************************************************************************************************************************************
Alas, the reigning US Champion and 2016 Sinquefield Cup winner had a horrible tournament. Here Wesley So prepares to face Fabiano Caruana. The game was a thoroughly unexciting draw.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
Fabiano Caruana was surrounded by fans after his interview. GM Alejandro Ramirez is second from the left.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
Nakamura lost a complicated game to Aronian. Team USA did not do well in this tournament.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
Levon Aronian, winner of the 2015 Sinquefield Cup, came close to winning the tournament again. After beating Nakamura, he was tied for first after Round 7. Here he waits for Nakamura to find a move.
Nakamura played 17.c4; now Aronian gets back to work.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************************************************
Calm while under fire: Sergey Karjakin.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
Vishy Anand had a good tournament. In this round, he played the white side of a sharp Sicilian Najdorf.
Ian Nepomniachtchi played Black against Vishy. The game was heading toward a draw, but then Nepo tried an unwise simplifying trick.
Nepo played 31...b4 32.cxb4 Rcc2, and at first glance, it appears that the two rooks on the 7th rank should be able to force a draw. But Anand replied with 33.b3! and his queenside pawns quickly overpowered Black's defenses. With this victory, Vishy was tied for first, but in the end, he had to settle for a tie for second with Carlsen.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
The World Champion was back in form, scoring +2 and tying for second. Peter Svidler played the Scotch against him. Eventually Carlsen was up a pawn in a rook ending, but Svidler held a draw.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
I love the commentary by Yasser Seirawan, Jennifer Shahade, and Maurice Ashley, but in the Round 9 broadcast, they botched a tactic. Here they were considering what would have happened if Karjakin had played 33...Rde8. Can you find the refutation? White to play.
Thursday, July 20, 2017
Sinquefield Cup
I will be out of town when the Sinquefield Cup starts, so I'm posting the forecast early. I will return in time to catch the last few rounds; pictures will be posted. I'm especially excited about the rapid and blitz tournaments that are coming up - GARRY KASPAROV is coming out of retirement to play there.
Methodology
E4stat has a new logo: a bivariate normal distribution under a chessboard.
Methodology
E4stat has a new logo: a bivariate normal distribution under a chessboard.
Thursday, July 13, 2017
Monday, July 10, 2017
Danzhou Grandmaster tournament forecast
This tournament began a few days ago. The top seed is Ding Liren, who is currently in the world's top ten. Here is the forecast before the tournament started:
The tournament began rather peacefully (90% draws in the first 2 rounds), so the forecast doesn't change very much after Round 2.
The tournament began rather peacefully (90% draws in the first 2 rounds), so the forecast doesn't change very much after Round 2.
Tuesday, July 4, 2017
Real GDP per capita by state
(To the chess players following my blog: this is my only post that isn't about chess. I will get back to forecasting top tournaments shortly)
In the US, we have 50 economic laboratories (or states, as normal people call them) in which to conduct policy experiments. But until recently, it was difficult to assess the results. This is because prices vary enormously across the country. In my personal experience, $1000 in Kirksville, Missouri will buy a lot more than $1000 in Seattle, Washington. As a result, incomes are not directly comparable across states and regions. If average income in State X is $50,000 while it's $40,000 in State Y, we shouldn't assume that State X is richer. If everything in State X is twice as expensive, then its residents actually have less buying power.
So the price level in a state matters, and if we don't account for it, then our results might be misleading. Fortunately, GeoFRED now has price data from all 50 states. The Regional Price Parity Index is scaled so that it equals 100 for the average across all the states. I combined this with data on state GDP and population. The result is GDP per capita data that is adjusted for the state's price level. Here are a two maps with the results for 2015.
In the US, we have 50 economic laboratories (or states, as normal people call them) in which to conduct policy experiments. But until recently, it was difficult to assess the results. This is because prices vary enormously across the country. In my personal experience, $1000 in Kirksville, Missouri will buy a lot more than $1000 in Seattle, Washington. As a result, incomes are not directly comparable across states and regions. If average income in State X is $50,000 while it's $40,000 in State Y, we shouldn't assume that State X is richer. If everything in State X is twice as expensive, then its residents actually have less buying power.
So the price level in a state matters, and if we don't account for it, then our results might be misleading. Fortunately, GeoFRED now has price data from all 50 states. The Regional Price Parity Index is scaled so that it equals 100 for the average across all the states. I combined this with data on state GDP and population. The result is GDP per capita data that is adjusted for the state's price level. Here are a two maps with the results for 2015.
And here is the table with the numbers. The richest state is...Washington D.C., which isn't a state. The state with the highest real GDP per capita is North Dakota. Missouri is around the middle of the pack. There is a huge amount of variation across states. North Dakota's real GDP per capita is nearly double that of Mississippi. Adjusting for state price levels can make a large difference. For example, in nominal dollars, Hawaii appears to be doing well, but once the high cost of living is factored in, it is actually one of the poorer states.
Rank Real GDP PC State
1 154,421.3373 District of Columbia
2 80060.5584 North Dakota
3 72652.66931 Delaware
4 69851.81862 Wyoming
5 68527.06189 Alaska
6 67302.29894 Massachusetts
7 66127.30755 Nebraska
8 65776.80559 Connecticut
9 63491.70446 New York
10 62362.12019 Iowa
11 62209.54228 South Dakota
12 61205.92307 Minnesota
13 60680.76384 Texas
14 60324.22161 Illinois
15 59490.66586 Washington
16 58668.9758 Ohio
17 57786.80952 Kansas
18 56566.837 Pennsylvania
19 56347.08586 California
20 56281.47129 Louisiana
21 56165.73898 Virginia
22 56162.43017 Wisconsin
23 55740.34301 Maryland
24 55720.95019 Colorado
25 55696.53155 New Jersey
26 55581.05966 Indiana
27 54604.03253 North Carolina
28 54233.0421 Oregon
29 53946.792 Missouri
30 53522.22254 Oklahoma
31 53412.85035 Rhode Island
32 53408.90286 Tennessee
33 53177.80317 New Hampshire
34 53101.21558 Georgia
35 51397.26629 Utah
36 50750.32633 Michigan
37 49917.14963 Nevada
38 48950.75208 Kentucky
39 47633.61484 Vermont
40 47604.77343 Hawaii
41 47473.56822 New Mexico
42 47465.52086 Alabama
43 46856.86443 Montana
44 45662.75954 South Carolina
45 45598.63808 Arkansas
46 44836.66775 West Virginia
47 44438.22669 Arizona
48 44004.59498 Maine
49 43877.81112 Florida
50 42403.47641 Idaho
51 41085.36712 Mississippi
Sources:
Regional Price Parities: All Items by State (Index) from GeoFRED
Resident Population by State (Thousands of Persons) from GeoFRED
Total Gross Domestic Product by State (Millions of Dollars) from GeoFRED
The maps were created using Google's Fusion Tables
Tuesday, June 6, 2017
Altibox Norway Chess
The Norway Chess Tournament has begun. Will Wesley So continue to dominate elite tournaments? Will Carlsen reassert his status as World Champion? Or will some other top player prevail? Here's my forecast.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









