Magnus is the favorite, but don't be shocked if someone else takes first - the field is extremely strong.
Tuesday, August 30, 2022
Thursday, August 11, 2022
Ratings and the Olympiad
In an earlier article (Are 2700s Overrated? Insights From the New Model), I showed that 2700s underperform when they face weaker opponents. For example, a 2750 is expected to score 70% against a 2600. This comes from Elo's formula. However, in the data, he is only scoring about 65%. Thus, if a 2750 plays 11 games against 2600s, he will probably lose 5.5 rating points (i.e. 5% per game multiplied by 11 games multiplied by a K factor of 10). So we would expect members of the 2700 club to shed points in the Olympiad. Here is how they did:
Carlsen -3
So -2
Giri +4.3
Aronian -16.4
Caruana -18.3
Mamedyarov -0.5
Dominguez -9.4
Duda -9.1
Harikrishna -3.8
Maghsoodloo +11.9
Shankland -7.5
Vallejo +0.8
Vidit -3.7
Wojtaszek -14.8
(Data from 2700chess.com)
With a few exceptions, their ratings fell. However, it was especially bad for Team USA. "2700s tend to be overrated" doesn't fully explain their performance. Some other factor must be at work.