Thursday, August 11, 2022

Ratings and the Olympiad

In an earlier article (Are 2700s Overrated? Insights From the New Model), I showed that 2700s underperform when they face weaker opponents. For example, a 2750 is expected to score 70% against a 2600. This comes from Elo's formula. However, in the data, he is only scoring about 65%. Thus, if a 2750 plays 11 games against 2600s, he will probably lose 5.5 rating points (i.e. 5% per game multiplied by 11 games multiplied by a K factor of 10). So we would expect members of the 2700 club to shed points in the Olympiad. Here is how they did:

Carlsen -3

So -2

Giri +4.3

Aronian -16.4

Caruana -18.3

Mamedyarov -0.5

Dominguez -9.4

Duda -9.1

Harikrishna -3.8

Maghsoodloo +11.9

Shankland -7.5

Vallejo +0.8

Vidit -3.7

Wojtaszek -14.8

(Data from 2700chess.com)


With a few exceptions, their ratings fell. However, it was especially bad for Team USA. "2700s tend to be overrated" doesn't fully explain their performance. Some other factor must be at work.


No comments:

Post a Comment